Cleaning

Mrs. Meyer's Clean Day All-Purpose Cleaner, Lavender

Chemistry

6/10

Corporate

Disclosure is voluntary here

Unlike food and cosmetics, US cleaning products are not required to disclose a full ingredient list. A short list can mean a simple formula — or an undisclosed one. Our score can only read what is disclosed.

Chemistry breakdown

Bar length = weight in the Cleaning formula · color = that component's score · tap a name to learn what it means.

Scored from 80% of the formula's weight. The rest doesn't apply to this product.

VOCs / respiratory5.8/10 · 35% weight

Volatile compounds that end up in the air you breathe while cleaning — the main exposure route for cleaning products.

Endocrine disruptors5.8/10 · 25% weight

Chemicals that can interfere with the body's hormone system — the signals that regulate growth, metabolism and reproduction. Exposure matters most during pregnancy and early childhood, which is why this component carries extra weight in baby products. Common examples under study: certain parabens, phthalates and bisphenols.

Aquatic / environmental5.8/10 · 20% weight

What happens after it goes down the drain — toxicity to aquatic life and how quickly it breaks down.

Ingredient disclosureno data · 10% weight

US law doesn't require cleaning products to list full ingredients. This measures how much the maker chooses to disclose.

Certificationsnone claimed · 10% weight

Independent third-party verifications (USDA Organic, FSC, EPA Safer Choice…). Informational only — having none never lowers a score; verified claims can raise it.

Ingredients · 3

As disclosed by the maker — US law does not require cleaning products to list every ingredient. Tap any row for its sources.

Made by

S.C. Johnson & Son

Private cleaning + personal care; some regulatory fines; acquired Method 2017 + Mrs. Meyer's brand.

2020"Non-toxic" marketing claims on Windex — A consumer class action alleged that marketing Windex as non-toxic was misleading given its ingredients. The matter resolved without an admission of liability, and no court found the product unsafe in normal use. Recorded because the claim concerned label accuracy — the thing this database itself depends on — not because wrongdoing was established.